token.app › Compare › R1 vs Muse Spark 1.2
R1 vs Muse Spark 1.2
R1 is 1.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| R1 | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Input $/1M | $0.700 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $2.50 | $4.25 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.15 | $2.00 |
| Context window | 164K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Released | Jan 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose R1 if…
- Costs less per token — $1.15 vs $2.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, R1 or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both R1 and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is R1 cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
R1 is cheaper: $1.15 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.700 vs $1.25. Output alone: $2.50 vs $4.25.
What context windows do R1 and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
R1: 163,840 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes R1 and Muse Spark 1.2?
R1 is made by DeepSeek. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.