token.app › Compare › R1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
R1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 21× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| R1 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.700 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $2.50 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.15 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Released | Jan 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose R1 if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $1.15 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, R1 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both R1 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is R1 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $1.15 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.700 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.50 vs $0.130.
What context windows do R1 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
R1: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes R1 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
R1 is made by DeepSeek. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.