token.app › Compare › Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Llama Guard 4 12B is 1.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Llama Guard 4 12B | GPT-5.6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
| Input $/1M | $0.180 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $0.180 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.180 | $0.225 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.1M |
| Max output | 16K | 128K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Llama Guard 4 12B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.180 vs $0.225 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
- Larger context window (1.1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama Guard 4 12B or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama Guard 4 12B and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama Guard 4 12B cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
Llama Guard 4 12B is cheaper: $0.180 versus $0.225 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.180 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.180 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Llama Guard 4 12B and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 1,048,576 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Llama Guard 4 12B and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Llama Guard 4 12B is made by Meta. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons