token.app › Compare › Llama Guard 4 12B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Llama Guard 4 12B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Llama Guard 4 12B is 11× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Input $/1M | $0.180 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $0.180 | $4.25 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.180 | $2.00 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Llama Guard 4 12B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.180 vs $2.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama Guard 4 12B or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama Guard 4 12B and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama Guard 4 12B cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Llama Guard 4 12B is cheaper: $0.180 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.180 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.180 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Llama Guard 4 12B and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama Guard 4 12B and Muse Spark 1.2?
Llama Guard 4 12B is made by Meta. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.
Related comparisons