token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 7.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3.1DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderMistral AIDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.400$0.090
Output $/1M$2.00$0.180
Blended $/1M$0.800$0.113
Context window131K1.0M
Max output—384K
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $0.800 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper: $0.113 versus $0.800 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.090. Output alone: $2.00 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Mistral Medium 3.1: 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is made by Mistral AI. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.1 full details DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 full details Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max Mistral Medium 3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Inkling Small Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash