token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Mistral Medium 3.1 is 3.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.400$2.00
Output $/1M$2.00$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.800$3.00
Context window131K1M
Max output—131K
ReleasedAug 2025Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.800 vs $3.00 blended
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.8 Max?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper: $0.800 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $2.00. Output alone: $2.00 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max have?
Mistral Medium 3.1: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is made by Mistral AI. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.1 full details Qwen3.8 Max full details Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Mistral Medium 3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Mistral Medium 3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Inkling Small Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash