token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Inkling Small

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Inkling Small

Inkling Small is 1.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3.1Inkling Small
ProviderMistral AIThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.400$0.450
Output $/1M$2.00$1.20
Blended $/1M$0.800$0.637
Context window131K524K
Max output—262K
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Inkling Small if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.637 vs $0.800 blended
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.1 and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 cheaper than Inkling Small?
Inkling Small is cheaper: $0.637 versus $0.800 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.450. Output alone: $2.00 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Inkling Small have?
Mistral Medium 3.1: 131,072 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.1 and Inkling Small?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is made by Mistral AI. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.1 full details Inkling Small full details Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max Mistral Medium 3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Mistral Medium 3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash