token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Mistral Medium 3.1 is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3.1Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderMistral AIMeta
Input $/1M$0.400$1.25
Output $/1M$2.00$4.25
Blended $/1M$0.800$2.00
Context window131K1.0M
Max output——
ReleasedAug 2025Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.800 vs $2.00 blended
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.1 and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper: $0.800 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $1.25. Output alone: $2.00 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Mistral Medium 3.1: 131,072 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.1 and Muse Spark 1.2?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is made by Mistral AI. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.
Related comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.1 full details Muse Spark 1.2 full details Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max Mistral Medium 3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Mistral Medium 3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Inkling Small Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash