token.app › Compare › Saba vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Saba vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Saba is 1.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Saba | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Reflection |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $0.250 |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | $1.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.300 | $0.438 |
| Context window | 33K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 26K | 131K |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
Choose Saba if…
- Costs less per token — $0.300 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Saba is cheaper: $0.300 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.600 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Saba and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Saba and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.