token.app › Compare › Saba vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)

Saba vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)

Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) is free to use, against $0.300 per million tokens. Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
SabaXing4.0 29B A4B (free)
ProviderMistral AIXingchen agi
Input $/1M$0.200Free
Output $/1M$0.600Free
Blended $/1M$0.300Free
Context window33K262K
Max output26K236K
ReleasedFeb 2025Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Saba if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $0.300 blended
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and Xing4.0 29B A4B (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)?
Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.300 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs Free. Output alone: $0.600 vs Free.
What context windows do Saba and Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Xing4.0 29B A4B (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Saba and Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) is made by Xingchen agi.
Related comparisons