token.app › Compare › Saba vs Mercury 3
Saba vs Mercury 3
Mercury 3 is 1.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Saba | Mercury 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Inception |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | $0.350 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.300 | $0.163 |
| Context window | 33K | 1M |
| Max output | 26K | 131K |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Saba if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Mercury 3 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.300 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.300 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.600 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Saba and Mercury 3 have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Saba and Mercury 3?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.