token.app › Compare › Saba vs Flint (free)
Saba vs Flint (free)
Flint (free) is free to use, against $0.300 per million tokens. Flint (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Saba | Flint (free) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Recursive |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | Free |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | Free |
| Blended $/1M | $0.300 | Free |
| Context window | 33K | 262K |
| Max output | 26K | 236K |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
Choose Saba if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Flint (free) if…
- Costs less per token — Free vs $0.300 blended
- Larger context window (262K)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or Flint (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and Flint (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than Flint (free)?
Flint (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.300 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs Free. Output alone: $0.600 vs Free.
What context windows do Saba and Flint (free) have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Flint (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Saba and Flint (free)?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. Flint (free) is made by Recursive.