token.app › Compare › Saba vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Saba vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 2.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
SabaDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderMistral AIDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.200$0.090
Output $/1M$0.600$0.180
Blended $/1M$0.300$0.113
Context window33K1.0M
Max output384K
ReleasedFeb 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Saba if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $0.300 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper: $0.113 versus $0.300 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.090. Output alone: $0.600 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Saba and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Saba and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons