token.app › Compare › Saba vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Saba vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Saba is 2.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Saba | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $0.300 |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | $2.50 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.300 | $0.850 |
| Context window | 33K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 26K | 66K |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Saba if…
- Costs less per token — $0.300 vs $0.850 blended
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Saba is cheaper: $0.300 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.300. Output alone: $0.600 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Saba and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Saba and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.