token.app › Compare › Saba vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Saba vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Saba is 10.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Saba | Gemini 3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $1.50 |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | $7.50 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.300 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 33K | 1.0M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Saba if…
- Costs less per token — $0.300 vs $3.00 blended
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Saba is cheaper: $0.300 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $1.50. Output alone: $0.600 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Saba and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Saba and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.