token.app › Compare › Saba vs Inkling Small
Saba vs Inkling Small
Saba is 2.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Saba | Inkling Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $0.450 |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | $1.20 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.300 | $0.637 |
| Context window | 33K | 524K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
Choose Saba if…
- Costs less per token — $0.300 vs $0.637 blended
Choose Inkling Small if…
- Larger context window (524K)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than Inkling Small?
Saba is cheaper: $0.300 versus $0.637 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.450. Output alone: $0.600 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Saba and Inkling Small have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Saba and Inkling Small?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.