token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyBeam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderNVIDIAReflection
Input $/1M$0.200$0.250
Output $/1M$0.200$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.200$0.438
Context window131K1.0M
Max output118K131K
ReleasedJun 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.200 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is cheaper: $0.200 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.200 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is made by NVIDIA. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety full details Beam 1.0 501B A23B full details Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Flint (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Glimpse Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Mercury 3