token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 1.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderNVIDIADeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.200$0.150
Output $/1M$0.200$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.200$0.262
Context window131K1.0M
Max output118K393K
ReleasedJun 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.200 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is cheaper: $0.200 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.200 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is made by NVIDIA. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Flint (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Glimpse Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Mercury 3