token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Mercury 3

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Mercury 3

Mercury 3 is 1.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyMercury 3
ProviderNVIDIAInception
Input $/1M$0.200$0.100
Output $/1M$0.200$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.200$0.163
Context window131K1M
Max output118K131K
ReleasedJun 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.200 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.200 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.200 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Mercury 3 have?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Mercury 3?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is made by NVIDIA. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety full details Mercury 3 full details Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Flint (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Glimpse Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B