token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Flint (free)

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Flint (free)

Flint (free) is free to use, against $0.200 per million tokens. Flint (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyFlint (free)
ProviderNVIDIARecursive
Input $/1M$0.200Free
Output $/1M$0.200Free
Blended $/1M$0.200Free
Context window131K262K
Max output118K236K
ReleasedJun 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Flint (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $0.200 blended
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Flint (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Flint (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety cheaper than Flint (free)?
Flint (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.200 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs Free. Output alone: $0.200 vs Free.
What context windows do Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Flint (free) have?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. Flint (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Flint (free)?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is made by NVIDIA. Flint (free) is made by Recursive.
Related comparisons
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety full details Flint (free) full details Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Glimpse Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Mercury 3