token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Claude Opus 5

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Claude Opus 5

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is 13× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Claude Opus 5 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructClaude Opus 5
ProviderAlibabaAnthropic
Input $/1M$0.660$5.00
Output $/1M$1.00$25.00
Blended $/1M$0.745$10.00
Context window33K1M
Max output33K128K
ReleasedNov 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.745 vs $10.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Claude Opus 5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Claude Opus 5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than Claude Opus 5?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is cheaper: $0.745 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.660 vs $5.00. Output alone: $1.00 vs $25.00.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Claude Opus 5 have?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. Claude Opus 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Claude Opus 5?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct full details Claude Opus 5 full details Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Inkling Small