token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is 4.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructGemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.660$1.50
Output $/1M$1.00$7.50
Blended $/1M$0.745$3.00
Context window33K1.0M
Max output33K66K
ReleasedNov 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.745 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is cheaper: $0.745 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.660 vs $1.50. Output alone: $1.00 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct full details Gemini 3.6 Flash full details Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Inkling Small