token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Grok 4.6

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Grok 4.6

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is 4.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Grok 4.6 accepts the larger context window (500K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructGrok 4.6
ProviderAlibabaSpaceXAI
Input $/1M$0.660$2.00
Output $/1M$1.00$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.745$3.00
Context window33K500K
Max output29K450K
ReleasedNov 2024Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.745 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • Larger context window (500K)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Grok 4.6?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Grok 4.6, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than Grok 4.6?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is cheaper: $0.745 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.660 vs $2.00. Output alone: $1.00 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Grok 4.6 have?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Grok 4.6?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.6 is made by SpaceXAI.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct full details Grok 4.6 full details Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Flint (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Glimpse Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B