token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Inkling

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Inkling

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is 2.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructInkling
ProviderAlibabaThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.660$1.00
Output $/1M$1.00$4.05
Blended $/1M$0.745$1.76
Context window33K524K
Max output29K472K
ReleasedNov 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.745 vs $1.76 blended
Choose Inkling if…
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than Inkling?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is cheaper: $0.745 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.660 vs $1.00. Output alone: $1.00 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Inkling have?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Inkling?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct full details Inkling full details Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Flint (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Glimpse Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B