token.app › Compare › Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 2.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Beam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAlibabaReflection
Input $/1M$0.450$0.250
Output $/1M$3.50$1.00
Blended $/1M$1.21$0.438
Context window128K1.0M
Max output16K131K
ReleasedJul 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $1.21 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $1.21 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.450 vs $0.250. Output alone: $3.50 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 full details Beam 1.0 501B A23B full details Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Flint (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Glimpse Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Mercury 3