token.app › Compare › Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 4.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.450$0.150
Output $/1M$3.50$0.600
Blended $/1M$1.21$0.262
Context window128K1.0M
Max output16K393K
ReleasedJul 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $1.21 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $1.21 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.450 vs $0.150. Output alone: $3.50 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons