token.app › Compare › Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Glimpse

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Glimpse

Glimpse is 1.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Glimpse accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Glimpse
ProviderAlibabaElorian
Input $/1M$0.450$0.600
Output $/1M$3.50$3.00
Blended $/1M$1.21$1.20
Context window128K262K
Max output16K256K
ReleasedJul 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Glimpse if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.20 vs $1.21 blended
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Glimpse?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Glimpse, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper than Glimpse?
Glimpse is cheaper: $1.20 versus $1.21 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.450 vs $0.600. Output alone: $3.50 vs $3.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Glimpse have?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens. Glimpse: 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Glimpse?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by Alibaba. Glimpse is made by Elorian.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 full details Glimpse full details Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Flint (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Mercury 3