token.app › Compare › Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Mercury 3

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Mercury 3

Mercury 3 is 7.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Mercury 3
ProviderAlibabaInception
Input $/1M$0.450$0.100
Output $/1M$3.50$0.350
Blended $/1M$1.21$0.163
Context window128K1M
Max output16K131K
ReleasedJul 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $1.21 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $1.21 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.450 vs $0.100. Output alone: $3.50 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Mercury 3 have?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Mercury 3?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by Alibaba. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 full details Mercury 3 full details Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Flint (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Glimpse Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B