token.app › Compare › Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 5

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 5

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 8.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Claude Opus 5 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Claude Opus 5
ProviderAlibabaAnthropic
Input $/1M$0.450$5.00
Output $/1M$3.50$25.00
Blended $/1M$1.21$10.00
Context window128K1M
Max output16K128K
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.21 vs $10.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Claude Opus 5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Claude Opus 5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper than Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper: $1.21 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.450 vs $5.00. Output alone: $3.50 vs $25.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Claude Opus 5 have?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens. Claude Opus 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by Alibaba. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 full details Claude Opus 5 full details Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Flint (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Glimpse Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B