token.app › Compare › Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 5

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 5

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 13× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Claude Opus 5 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Claude Opus 5
ProviderAlibabaAnthropic
Input $/1M$0.230$5.00
Output $/1M$2.30$25.00
Blended $/1M$0.747$10.00
Context window262K1M
Max output—128K
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.747 vs $10.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Claude Opus 5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Claude Opus 5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper than Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper: $0.747 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.230 vs $5.00. Output alone: $2.30 vs $25.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Claude Opus 5 have?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 262,144 tokens. Claude Opus 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by Alibaba. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 full details Claude Opus 5 full details Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Inkling Small