token.app › Compare › Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 1.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.450$0.300
Output $/1M$3.50$2.50
Blended $/1M$1.21$0.850
Context window128K1.0M
Max output16K66K
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.850 vs $1.21 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper: $0.850 versus $1.21 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.450 vs $0.300. Output alone: $3.50 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons