token.app › Compare › Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 4.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Gemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.230$1.50
Output $/1M$2.30$7.50
Blended $/1M$0.747$3.00
Context window262K1.0M
Max output—66K
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.747 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper: $0.747 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.230 vs $1.50. Output alone: $2.30 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 262,144 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 full details Gemini 3.6 Flash full details Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Inkling Small