token.app › Compare › Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Inkling

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Inkling

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 1.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Inkling
ProviderAlibabaThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.450$1.00
Output $/1M$3.50$4.05
Blended $/1M$1.21$1.76
Context window128K524K
Max output16K472K
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.21 vs $1.76 blended
Choose Inkling if…
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper than Inkling?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper: $1.21 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.450 vs $1.00. Output alone: $3.50 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Inkling have?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Inkling?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by Alibaba. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 full details Inkling full details Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Flint (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Glimpse Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B