token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Claude Opus 5
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Claude Opus 5
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 3.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Claude Opus 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Anthropic |
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $5.00 |
| Output $/1M | $6.00 | $25.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.00 | $10.00 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | 909K | 128K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B if…
- Costs less per token — $3.00 vs $10.00 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Claude Opus 5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Claude Opus 5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheaper than Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper: $3.00 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $5.00. Output alone: $6.00 vs $25.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Claude Opus 5 have?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens. Claude Opus 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is made by Alibaba. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic.
Related comparisons