token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 4.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$2.00$0.440
Output $/1M$6.00$1.32
Blended $/1M$3.00$0.660
Context window1.0M1.0M
Max output909K131K
ReleasedAug 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B if…
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.660 vs $3.00 blended
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper: $0.660 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $0.440. Output alone: $6.00 vs $1.32.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B full details DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 full details Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Flint (free) Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Glimpse Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B