token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash is 2.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BGemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$2.00$0.750
Output $/1M$6.00$3.75
Blended $/1M$3.00$1.50
Context window1.0M1.0M
Max output909K66K
ReleasedAug 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.50 vs $3.00 blended
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper: $1.50 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $0.750. Output alone: $6.00 vs $3.75.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B full details Gemini 3.6 Flash full details Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Flint (free) Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Glimpse Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B