token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Grok 4.6
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Grok 4.6
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | SpaceXAI |
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $6.00 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.00 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 500K |
| Max output | 909K | 450K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Grok 4.6?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Grok 4.6, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheaper than Grok 4.6?
They cost the same on a blended 3:1 basis: $3.00 per million tokens.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Grok 4.6 have?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens. Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Grok 4.6?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.6 is made by SpaceXAI.
Related comparisons