token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Inkling
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Inkling
Inkling is 1.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $1.00 |
| Output $/1M | $6.00 | $4.05 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.00 | $1.76 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 524K |
| Max output | 909K | 472K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Inkling if…
- Costs less per token — $1.76 vs $3.00 blended
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheaper than Inkling?
Inkling is cheaper: $1.76 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $1.00. Output alone: $6.00 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Inkling have?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Inkling?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is made by Alibaba. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons