token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Inkling Small
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Inkling Small
Inkling Small is 4.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Inkling Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $0.450 |
| Output $/1M | $6.00 | $1.20 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.00 | $0.637 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 524K |
| Max output | 909K | 262K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Inkling Small if…
- Costs less per token — $0.637 vs $3.00 blended
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheaper than Inkling Small?
Inkling Small is cheaper: $0.637 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $0.450. Output alone: $6.00 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Inkling Small have?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Inkling Small?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is made by Alibaba. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons