token.app › Compare › Command R7B (12-2024) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is free to use, against $0.066 per million tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R7B (12-2024)Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
ProviderCohereInclusionai
Input $/1M$0.037Free
Output $/1M$0.150Free
Blended $/1M$0.066Free
Context window128K262K
Max output4K33K
ReleasedDec 2024Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Command R7B (12-2024) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $0.066 blended
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R7B (12-2024) or Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R7B (12-2024) and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R7B (12-2024) cheaper than Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.066 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.037 vs Free. Output alone: $0.150 vs Free.
What context windows do Command R7B (12-2024) and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) have?
Command R7B (12-2024): 128,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Command R7B (12-2024) and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Command R7B (12-2024) is made by Cohere. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is made by Inclusionai.
Related comparisons
Command R7B (12-2024) full details Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) full details Command R7B (12-2024) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Command R7B (12-2024) vs Inkling Small Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.7 Flash