token.app › Compare › Command R7B (12-2024) vs Muse Spark 1.2

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Muse Spark 1.2

Command R7B (12-2024) is 30× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R7B (12-2024)Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderCohereMeta
Input $/1M$0.037$1.25
Output $/1M$0.150$4.25
Blended $/1M$0.066$2.00
Context window128K1.0M
Max output4K—
ReleasedDec 2024Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Command R7B (12-2024) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.066 vs $2.00 blended
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R7B (12-2024) or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R7B (12-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R7B (12-2024) cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Command R7B (12-2024) is cheaper: $0.066 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.037 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.150 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Command R7B (12-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Command R7B (12-2024): 128,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Command R7B (12-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2?
Command R7B (12-2024) is made by Cohere. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.
Related comparisons
Command R7B (12-2024) full details Muse Spark 1.2 full details Command R7B (12-2024) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Command R7B (12-2024) vs Inkling Small Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.7 Flash