token.app › Compare › Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Command R7B (12-2024) is 46× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Command R7B (12-2024) | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.037 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.150 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.066 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Released | Dec 2024 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Command R7B (12-2024) if…
- Costs less per token — $0.066 vs $3.00 blended
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R7B (12-2024) or Qwen3.8 Max?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R7B (12-2024) and Qwen3.8 Max, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R7B (12-2024) cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
Command R7B (12-2024) is cheaper: $0.066 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.037 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.150 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Command R7B (12-2024) and Qwen3.8 Max have?
Command R7B (12-2024): 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Command R7B (12-2024) and Qwen3.8 Max?
Command R7B (12-2024) is made by Cohere. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Command R7B (12-2024) full details
Qwen3.8 Max full details
Command R7B (12-2024) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
Command R7B (12-2024) vs Muse Spark 1.2
Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Command R7B (12-2024) vs Inkling Small
Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.7 Flash