token.app › Compare › GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is 3.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GLM 5.2 | DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | ~deepseek |
| Input $/1M | $0.252 | $0.090 |
| Output $/1M | $0.792 | $0.180 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.387 | $0.113 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 128K | 384K |
| Released | Jun 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest if…
- Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $0.387 blended
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GLM 5.2 or DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GLM 5.2 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GLM 5.2 cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is cheaper: $0.113 versus $0.387 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.252 vs $0.090. Output alone: $0.792 vs $0.180.
What context windows do GLM 5.2 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest have?
GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes GLM 5.2 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest?
GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI. DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is made by ~deepseek.