token.app › Compare › GLM 5.2 vs Inkling Small
GLM 5.2 vs Inkling Small
GLM 5.2 is 1.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GLM 5.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GLM 5.2 | Inkling Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $0.252 | $0.450 |
| Output $/1M | $0.792 | $1.20 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.387 | $0.637 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 524K |
| Max output | 128K | 262K |
| Released | Jun 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.387 vs $0.637 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
Choose Inkling Small if…
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GLM 5.2 or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GLM 5.2 and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GLM 5.2 cheaper than Inkling Small?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper: $0.387 versus $0.637 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.252 vs $0.450. Output alone: $0.792 vs $1.20.
What context windows do GLM 5.2 and Inkling Small have?
GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes GLM 5.2 and Inkling Small?
GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.