token.app › Compare › GLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
GLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 7.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GLM 5.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GLM 5.2 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.252 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.792 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.387 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Released | Jun 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.387 blended
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GLM 5.2 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GLM 5.2 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GLM 5.2 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.387 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.252 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.792 vs $0.130.
What context windows do GLM 5.2 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GLM 5.2 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.