token.app › Compare › GLM 5.2 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
GLM 5.2 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is free to use, against $0.387 per million tokens. GLM 5.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GLM 5.2 | Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | Inclusionai |
| Input $/1M | $0.252 | Free |
| Output $/1M | $0.792 | Free |
| Blended $/1M | $0.387 | Free |
| Context window | 1.0M | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 33K |
| Released | Jun 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) if…
- Costs less per token — Free vs $0.387 blended
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GLM 5.2 or Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GLM 5.2 and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GLM 5.2 cheaper than Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.387 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.252 vs Free. Output alone: $0.792 vs Free.
What context windows do GLM 5.2 and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) have?
GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes GLM 5.2 and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is made by Inclusionai.