token.app › Compare › GLM 5.2 vs Muse Spark 1.2
GLM 5.2 vs Muse Spark 1.2
GLM 5.2 is 5.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GLM 5.2 | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | Meta |
| Input $/1M | $0.252 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $0.792 | $4.25 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.387 | $2.00 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Released | Jun 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.387 vs $2.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GLM 5.2 or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GLM 5.2 and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GLM 5.2 cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper: $0.387 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.252 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.792 vs $4.25.
What context windows do GLM 5.2 and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes GLM 5.2 and Muse Spark 1.2?
GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.