token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.1 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna is 3.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | GPT-5.6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | OpenAI |
| Input $/1M | $0.400 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $2.00 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.800 | $0.225 |
| Context window | 131K | 1.1M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
- Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $0.800 blended
- Larger context window (1.1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.1 and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.225 versus $0.800 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.100. Output alone: $2.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.1 and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Mistral Medium 3.1: 131,072 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.1 and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is made by Mistral AI. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons