token.app › Compare › Saba vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
Saba vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is free to use, against $0.300 per million tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Saba | Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Inclusionai |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | Free |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | Free |
| Blended $/1M | $0.300 | Free |
| Context window | 33K | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Saba if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) if…
- Costs less per token — Free vs $0.300 blended
- Larger context window (262K)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.300 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs Free. Output alone: $0.600 vs Free.
What context windows do Saba and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Saba and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is made by Inclusionai.