token.app › Compare › Saba vs Muse Spark 1.2
Saba vs Muse Spark 1.2
Saba is 6.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Saba | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | $4.25 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.300 | $2.00 |
| Context window | 33K | 1.0M |
| Max output | — | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Saba if…
- Costs less per token — $0.300 vs $2.00 blended
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Saba is cheaper: $0.300 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.600 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Saba and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Saba and Muse Spark 1.2?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.