token.app › Compare › Saba vs Qwen3.8 Max
Saba vs Qwen3.8 Max
Saba is 10.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Saba | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.300 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 33K | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Saba if…
- Costs less per token — $0.300 vs $3.00 blended
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or Qwen3.8 Max?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and Qwen3.8 Max, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
Saba is cheaper: $0.300 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.600 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Saba and Qwen3.8 Max have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Saba and Qwen3.8 Max?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.